News

Car mag reveals the science behind what we already knew

A rather studious Swedish car mag has confirmed something we’ve pretty much taken as read in the Top Gear office: touchscreens in cars are actually kind of rubbish.

Vi Bilägare (We Car Owners), pitted 11 modern cars against one another, as well a 17-year-old Volvo V70. Because Sweden. But also because the V70 doesn’t have a single touchscreen, so it’s the yardstick. The bottom line? You might just want an old Volvo wagon.

Advertisement – Page continues below

For the test, VB drove modern cars from Nissan, VW, Volvo, Subaru, Mercedes, Hyundai, BMW, Dacia, MG, Seat and Tesla – and the Volvo V70 from 2005 – at 110kph (about 68mph). While on the move, the test drivers had to do simple tasks drivers tend to do on the move – reset the trip computer, turn on the radio and find a certain station, bump the climate control up a couple of degrees, run the seat heater, turn off the centre display and so on.

Before setting out, each driver had to familiarize themselves with each task.), before rolling out on a closed runway to see how long it took to do – and how far they drove with their eyes off the road.

Because the headline likely blew the suspense, we’ll just come out and say it – the Volvo V70 absolutely dominated the test, with its driver getting all the tasks done in the space of 10 seconds and 306 metres. Trying to do the same with the worst-performing car – the MG Marvel R SUV – its driver needed 44.6 seconds and 1,372 metres, or more than four-fifths of a mile.

Related:  DeLorean's latest car is not the same as the one you remember. Here's why

But that’s just MG proudly brandishing the wooden spoon it won decades ago, right? Not so much. Spend big on a BMW iX (overlooking that face and the fact that the Ioniq 5 exists) and you’ll triple the distance you need with your eyes off the road just to change a few settings on the fly. If you did get an Ioniq 5… well, that’s not great for on-the-fly adjustments, but then neither is a Seat Leon, VW ID.3, Nissan Qashqai or Tesla Model 3, taking between 717 metres (Tesla) and 895 metres (Seat) to get the job done. Even the relatively good Subaru and Mercedes took twice the time as an old Volvo wagon with all the toys.

Advertisement – Page continues below

The Model 3 did a good job here considering that all of its features can be controlled from one touchscreen. However, it still managed to score a midfield goal. Even if the vintage Volvo smashed that midfield result.

Thankfully, it’s not all bad news – the Volvo C40 took 417 metres before it was set for bum-warming with the screen off and heater up, and – good news! – the Dacia Sandero took just 414 metres, the least of any touchscreen-equipped car.

So, the upshot – if you want a new car with a screen and not an old Volvo – is make sure its manufacturer hasn’t tried to cram too many features into it.

Related:  Rare Deal: 30% Discount on Mous' MagSafe wall/car mount iPhone Mount

Images: Glenn Lindberg/Vi Bilägare

Receive all the latest news and reviews directly to your email.

Source link

Previous articleWill Axl defeat TAMA to be the best meme-coin of 2022
Next article20 Obi-Wan Kenobi Characters Get LEGO Star Wars Figures In New Fan Concept

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here